Description: The draft recovery plan incorporates the best available science on the oceanic whitetip shark to describe site-specific management actions necessary for the conservation and survival of the species (recovery actions), set objective, measurable criteria that, when met, will allow the species to be removed from the list of threatened and endangered species, and provide estimates of the time and funding required to achieve the plan's goals. Once finalized, the plan will be used to guide U.S. activities and to encourage international cooperation to promote the recovery of this endangered species.
ID: ID453 Info. Type: ISI
Estimated Initial Dissemination Date: 12/29/2023
Initial Dissemination Date: 9/1/2023
Actual Dissemination Date of peer review report and final work product:
Contact Person: Kristen Koyama, NMFS Office of Protected Resources, 301-427- 8456 kristen.koyama@noaa.gov
Review Type: Individual letters
Expected Number of Peer Reviewers: 3 or fewer
Peer Reviewers will be selected by: National Marine Fisheries Service
Will the public, including scientific or professional societies, be asked to nominate potential peer reviewers? No.
Will there be opportunities for the public to comment on the work product to be peer reviewed? Yes.
How: The availability of the draft recovery plan will be published in the Federal Register and a public comment period will be provided prior to adoption of the final recovery plan. The draft recovery plan and supporting documents will be available on the agency website.
When: The draft recovery plan will be open to public comment for 60 days upon publication of the notice of availability in the Federal Register. Peer review will occur simultaneously.
Will the agency provide significant and relevant public comments to the peer reviewers before they conduct their review? No.
Primary disciplines or expertise needed in the review: Oceanic whitetip shark biology, shark biology, oceanic whitetip shark fisheries, stock assessments, fisheries bycatch, highly migratory species, conservation biology, species recovery
Comments on Peer Review: